《福尔摩斯探案集·铜山毛榉案》第3节
“At the same time,” he remarked after a pause, during which he had sat puffing at his long pipe and gazing down into the fire, “you can hardly be open to a charge of sensationalism, for out of these cases which you have been so kind as to interest yourself in, a fair proportion do not treat of crime, in its legal sense, at all. The small matter in which I endeavoured to help the King of Bohemia, the singular experience of Miss Mary Sutherland, the problem connected with the man with the twisted lip, and the incident of the noble bachelor, were all matters which are outside the pale of the law. But in avoiding the sensational, I fear that you may have bordered on the trivial.” “The end may have been so,” I answered, “but the methods I hold to have been novel and of interest.” “Pshaw, my dear fellow, what do the public, the great unobservant public, who could hardly tell a weaver by his tooth or a compositor by his left thumb, care about the finer shades of analysis and deduction! But, indeed, if you are trivial, I cannot blame you, for the days of the great cases are past. Man, or at least criminal man, has lost all enterprise and originality. As to my own little practice, it seems to be degenerating into an agency for recovering lost lead pencils and giving advice to young ladies from boarding-schools. I think that I have touched bottom at last, however. This note I had this morning marks my zero-point, I fancy. Read it!” He tossed a crumpled letter across to me.
注释摘要
福尔摩斯在这段话里做了两件事。他先是替华生解了围，说那个“过于耸人听闻”的罪名其实安不到华生头上，因为华生挑来记录的那些案子，相当一部分在法律意义上根本不算犯罪。他随手举出四件：为波西米亚国王办的差事、玛丽·萨瑟兰小姐的奇遇、歪唇男人的案子、贵族单身汉事件。这正是前文华生自嘲“耸人听闻”时未曾想到的论据——没死人、没上法庭，何来耸动？这一来，福尔摩斯等于自…